4 prime congressional leaders, who have been amongst 23 signatories to the letter despatched to celebration chairperson Sonia Gandhi calling for reforms within the group final yr, mentioned on Tuesday they have been upholding their letter however have been disassociating themselves. current actions from a few of their colleagues within the G 23, because the group of signatories has come to be often called.
Considered one of them – Rajya Sabha’s former vp PJ Kurien – mentioned he was not in opposition to efforts to enhance Congress and introduce much-needed reforms, however argued that “the borders , the Lakshman rekha ”, shouldn’t be violated.
Among the G 23 leaders – Ghulam Nabi Azad, Anand Sharma, Kapil Sibal, Manish Tewari, Bhupinder Singh Hooda, Raj Babbar and Vivek Tankha – have been in Jammu final week on their first outing. They spoke at a joint public assembly, the place photographs have been fired on the celebration management for failing to make use of an “skilled” chief like Azad and letting him withdraw from the Rajya Sabha.
Someday later, Saturday, Azad congratulated Prime Minister Narendra Modi like somebody who “would not disguise their actual self”. And on Monday, Sharma assaults the management of the Bengal Congress for “the alliance” with the Indian Secular Entrance of Abbas Siddiqui, claiming that such an affiliation went in opposition to the central ideology of Congress.
Sources mentioned these leaders have been planning an identical occasion in Haryana within the coming weeks.
Talking to the Indian Categorical, Kurien mentioned, “Their actions are going properly to the purpose of strengthening Congress. However it should not turn out to be dissident exercise. Definitely, there’s a want for enchancment in Congress… and I’m not in opposition to… if the actions go on this route. They need to proceed with this in thoughts. I do not know the small print of the Jammu occasion. It’s only once I get all the small print that I can say whether or not this was a dissident exercise or an effort to strengthen the celebration.
“I’m not in opposition to efforts to strengthen and rectify Congress. I feel it’s obligatory. However the limits, the Lakshman rekha, have to be saved in thoughts. It should not turn out to be dissident exercise. As for the feedback relating to Bengal, their place should not assist defeat Congress… this have to be saved in thoughts….
Former Lok Sabha MP Sandeep Dikshit mentioned: “There is no such thing as a group. Twenty-three leaders signed the letter. Now what they do is … these 5-6’s acquired to do one thing. I, for instance, don’t know. It’s not a bunch. It is only a assortment of people that have expressed an opinion. We stand by this opinion. What people would do or teams inside teams would do or others would do… is their concern. “
Dikshit mentioned he did not imagine Azad was congratulating Modi. “Higher ask him… I have not been in touch with them.”
Ajay Singh, the chief congressman of Madhya Pradesh, mentioned: “The questions that have been raised within the letter relating to the elections to all boards… on which I’m a member. I’ve no real interest in saying that the Prime Minister is superb. The letter we signed was for the interior democracy of the celebration which I nonetheless keep is true… the remainder, everyone seems to be entitled to their very own opinion…. I’ve full confidence in Sonia Gandhi’s management, which the letter additionally says.
Just like the others, he mentioned he had not been knowledgeable of the Jammu occasion.
Former Union Minister and prime Congress chief M Veerappa Moily mentioned the letter had a restricted goal and that persevering with any exercise within the identify of this letter would quantity to abuse because it was despatched with a honest and honest hope of rejuvenating the celebration.
“The G 23 is just not an establishment just like the G 20…. When the elections happen [to be held] for 5 states, this isn’t the suitable time to debate party-related points… As quickly as we handed within the memorandum, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi instantly referred to as a gathering of the working committee… it was additionally determined to carry the elections. It was sufficient. That is the one restricted program. “
Relating to the Jammu occasion, he mentioned: “None of us supposed to go and neither of us have been invited to such a gathering. I do not wish to be one of many (members) of any splinter group. I’ve been loyal to the celebration and I wish to proceed on this celebration… So I’ve already dissociated myself.